Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 17:45
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Which branch of engineering is better: ECE or Civil?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why do many Hong Kong Chinese look different from the Han Chinese in mainland China?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Do you like Melania Trump's new official 1st lady black & white power portrait?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Isn’t freedom of speech and expression an absolute right?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why do almost all vertebrates have tails, but not apes and frogs?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.